Open alessandroperilli opened 1 week ago
Will it be helpful if we group the outputs by type? Saved outputs first then temp results (Previews, etc)
Yes, but it would be even more helpful if I could filter out the things I don't want to see. For example, I am REALLY happy that the queue system now captures all the intermediate images APW generates. I want that. But I don't care anything about the text outputs (because I can already see them in the terminal).
Regardless: I'm pretty sure APW doesn't generate 1212 outputs for each run. So, either I don't understand what's being captured, or there's some problem.
Frontend Version
1.2.44
(but this issue existed since the feature was introduced in previous versions)
Expected Behavior
For debugging purposes, for each image generation, AP Workflow produces a few intermediate images throughout the pipeline. For example: if the control panel is configured to enable the face detailer function and the upscaler, APW will generate:
Throughout the pipeline, for debugging purposes, APW also prints a few lines of text. So, the previous example would produce 2-3 text outputs in console detailing the parameters used for the generation.
According to this, and as I understand the new Task Output Folder View feature, I'd expect to see a folder output with 3 to 5-6 items in it (depending if only images are counted, or if also text is counted - this is unclear to me).
Actual Behavior
Actual behavior with all functions but txt2img enabled:
And yes. Clicking on the task folder number really shows 1212 items:
Steps to Reproduce
I see this with APW 11.0, which is still in Early Access. Didn't try with APW 10.0 which is GA. Happy to provide a copy if you want to investigate.
Debug Logs
Browser Logs
Attached. 192.168.1.6-1725350263197.log
What browsers do you use to access the UI ?
Other
Other
Vivaldi on macOS