search

CommonAccord / Cmacc-Org

The full CommonAccord.org website, including many of the sub repos.
http://commonaccord.org
MIT License
43 stars 27 forks source link

Deal examples #5

Open HazardJ opened 9 years ago

HazardJ commented 9 years ago

Please let me know any thoughts about this way of organizing:

http://new.commonaccord.org/index.php?action=list&file=Dx/Acme/

I expect that when sharing, Acme and, say Quake, will want to chose a folder name that combines them - Dx/Acme-Quake/ - or, of course, based on their identities. But this is a rough start.

LMK

mdangear commented 9 years ago

Deals could be Acme-Quake or Project names. Typically project names seem like a better idea if you want to keep it neutral (Acme-Quake or Quake-Acme, and what if we have a 2nd deal together). Would this make more sense?

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:21 PM, HazardJ notifications@github.com wrote:

Please let me know any thoughts about this way of organizing:

http://new.commonaccord.org/index.php?action=list&file=Dx/Acme/

I expect that when sharing, Acme and, say Quake, will want to chose a folder name that combines them - Dx/Acme-Quake/ - or, of course, based on their identities. But this is a rough start.

LMK

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/CommonAccord/Cmacc-Org/issues/5.

HazardJ commented 9 years ago

Now have a number of documents in http://new.commonaccord.org/index.php?action=list&file=Dx/Acme/, including most recently a Consulting Agreement. It would be very good to expand these examples and message the naming of deal points. E.g., is "EffectiveDate.YMD" a good name?