Closed jonathanvajda closed 4 days ago
Good suggestion, it seems that just about all countries require a license plate to travel on public roads, so it warrants consideration in the CCO.
My first intuition of a definition for Vehicle License Plate is A One Dimensional Barcode which is designed to carry some information about the registration or legal status of the vehicle to which it is attached or part of
. I'm being verbose so we can trim, but these seem like the salient parts.
In America, you carry your license plate from car to car; in (parts of) Europe, the license plate stays with the car. This presents an interesting issue, but both have to do with the legal status of some vehicle to which the plate is attached, whether it stays with that car or may be moved from car to car.
Is a license plate a one-dimensional or two-dimensional encoding? The CCO definition of One-Dimensional Barcode states that its concretizations consist of one-dimensional symbols, as in UPC barcodes. Digits are two-dimensional symbols. In fact, on the typical license plate, digits are stamped deeply enough to be three-dimensional, (Perhaps some expert on license plates can weigh in on whether the third dimension has an information-bearing use or is simply a necessity of manufacturing.)
@cameronmore, sorry to add an obscure exception, but I'm not sure you always carry license plates from car to car in America. Once upon a time in California, if you bought an antique car you had the option to retain its antique license plate. That was in the 80's. I don't know the current law.
That's a good point about license plates being stamped 3d objects, I was thinking about that too as I typed out my response. I'm fine with making it 3d, but the distinction between 2d and 3d doesn't feel right in general here in this part of the hierarchy.
I was mistaken about dimensionality for a plate
Though bar codes for licence plate numbers are on registration documents.
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023, 2:03 PM Cameron More @.***> wrote:
That's a good point about license plates being stamped 3d objects, I was thinking about that too as I typed out my response. I'm fine with making it 3d, but the distinction between 2d and 3d doesn't feel right in general here in this part of the hierarchy.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/CommonCoreOntology/CommonCoreOntologies/issues/205#issuecomment-1828445853, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIW242GAUU365KAHRNEKGTTYGTPZ3AVCNFSM6AAAAAA74KCDPWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMRYGQ2DKOBVGM . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Moving to discussion for coordination with ICE/IBE strategy.
There is a wide range of use cases where vehicles are described with respect to their vehicle plate (and the number), and this assists with entity resolution. This seems useful for manufacturing, commerce, government, university, and other contexts. I think this makes a good case for it being included in the common core rather than a lower-level ontology.
Just as with VIN (see the other issue https://github.com/CommonCoreOntology/CommonCoreOntologies/issues/204 ) we need to be clear on what design pattern we are following here. Is this correct?
For example:
My hesitation is that a vehicle plate number does not designate a vehicle, but rather a vehicle license. But people use it to designate a vehicle, indirectly. Is this correct?