Open swartik opened 3 months ago
@swartik Marriage is ambiguous. For discussion w.r.t. BFO, see section 4.5 of the following: https://philpapers.org/archive/OTTBBF.pdf
I believe in this case the intent is that cco:Marriage refers to the state during which the legal contract is valid. For this reason, it is a process and has duration and the relevant GDC would be the effective legal contract. One of the reasons I think it is preferred to model marriage in this way is that it also allows for easy timestamping in OWL, whereas performing this with a relational quality would require a three place predicate.
@APCox does my guess as to the intent seem correct?
The definition could be clearer w.r.t. the GDC in question. Any takers on a candidate revision?
I'm uncertain what class
Married
represents. It's a subclass ofStasis of Generically Dependent Continuant
. That being so, what is the GDC? The definition ofMarried
makes reference of a legal contract. Is the GDC therefore aDirective Information Content Entity
? That seems more like a marriage license than the marriage itself.In BFO, one of the examples of
relational quality
is "A marriage bond". Assuming that "marriage" is a colloquial form of "marriage bond", a marriage would fit more naturally in CCO as aStasis of Quality
.