Build a scenario generator for the CV module to add scenarios to the table

[GriffGreen]

Ideally it is as similar to the "add a step" feature in the bonding curve app as possible that way the user flows for both these features can build synergy.

Except we only have 1 question for them in the ABC.. and here we have 3 things to ask:

1. How much funding is the simulated proposal requesting? Requested Amount _____ wxDAI

2. How much wxDAI is being governed by Conviction Voting? Common Pool ___ wxDAI

3. How many TEC tokens are Actively Voting in Conviction Voting? Effective Supply ____ TEC

After they answer these 3 things, then we add that new Proposal (aka scenario) to the bottom of the List... We can cap it where ever it is reasonable.... but more is better ;-)

[markoprljic]

First I updated the side panel with the following:

• Added button "Add a Proposal"
• moved the "View Graph" and "Learn more" below the button
• Created new modal with 3 questions

Preview attached. Figma source https://www.figma.com/file/b6kx4mkaHxzq4TPzaI1eRY/TEC-Dapps?node-id=5109%3A6824

@marthendalnunes @GriffGreen Who else need to be tagged?

[GriffGreen]

:-D Great! THIS LOOKS GREAT!!!

I have one minor copy edit and one placement edit

instead of:

"Add a proposal to experience the Conviction Voting"

It should be

"Add a proposal to experience your Conviction Voting Configuration"

And the Learn more and view chart links should be right under Conviction growth (the View Graph is tied to that param)

@divine-comedian any other thoughts?

[divine-comedian]

Very Cool!

I would modify the text a bit.

First of all we don't want to cross terminology because we already submit "proposals" when we submit our commons config to github. I would substitute Proposal for Request and perhaps on the main page you could say "Simulate a Funding Request" or "Create Request" something along those lines

As for the questions in the following modal I would suggest:

`How much wxDAI is this simulated proposal requesting?

"How much wxDAI is in the Common Pool?" We could add a hover explainer if Common Pool isn't a clear term.. or make it link to the commons tribute forum post which has more info

-No changes on the third question

the other perhaps larger problem is getting users to contextualize effective supply, its hard to understand what a reasonable or realistic effective supply would be ... 10,000 TEC... 100,000 TEC ...

I don't know if there's a feasible way to make it relative to TEC minted for hatchers or relative to certain token supply benchmarks on the bonding curve.. some ideas to throw out there.

@GriffGreen @markoprljic

[markoprljic]

I made the editorial changes. https://www.figma.com/file/b6kx4mkaHxzq4TPzaI1eRY/TEC-Dapps?node-id=5109%3A6824

[divine-comedian]

as per params meeting 31/10

we should add in a couple pieces of information to give third question some context:

~2 million TEC tokens will be minted at launch for Hatchers.

~130,000 TEC tokens will be minted from the intial buy-in and progressively distributed.

then lets make a clean default value that is auto-filled (but modifiable) of 1.5 million TEC tokens as the effective supply

@GriffGreen

I also tweaked the figma with some small clarifying pieces and attached some relevant tooltips for developer reference. I did not incorporate the above mentioned comments, maybe you had some ideas how to cleanly work those in @markoprljic

https://www.figma.com/file/b6kx4mkaHxzq4TPzaI1eRY/TEC-Dapps?node-id=7531%3A6443

[GriffGreen]

Remove the 130k line!

[GriffGreen]