CommonsBuild / coordination

The Coordination repo issues serve to coordinate all the work across the Token Engineering Commons (TEC)
11 stars 4 forks source link

Investigate Nexus Mututal #65

Closed GriffGreen closed 3 years ago

GriffGreen commented 4 years ago

📋 Anything to add?

They have an insurance company that was set up to connect to a bonding curve... they have to follow some serious rules came out of convo in #35

🎉 Subtasks

🤼‍♂️ Reviewer

@

🔗 Work doc - inspirational links

joshuavial commented 4 years ago

I've been diving in to Nexus Mutual recently - here is a write up of what I've learned so far.

Summary

Nexus Mutual is an insurance DAO incorporated as a formal mutual in the UK. It has around 5k members and offers insurance-like cover for smart contract failure, with plans to offer cover for wallets and standard risks (e.g. earthquake) in the future.

Legal Structure

Nexus Mutual is established as a company limited by guarantee in the UK - the Financial Conduct Authority have given them the right to use mutual in their name.

Members are part-owners of the mutual and the NXM token is used to represent membership rights. Here is a list of the company filing history including the articles of association.

Membership

Each member goes through KYC and pays a 0.02 ETH membership fee. Membership conveys the following entitlements

Token design

Only Nexus Mutual Members can purchase, hold or use NXM - tokens can be purchased or redeemed at any time at a variable price computed algorithmically. The token is intended to align long term interests of mutual members and align the price with the financial performance of the mutual. The token model page covers the details, but the key variables driving the price are

Price = A + (MCR / C) * MCR%^4

Price and MCR are denominated in ETH, A and C are constants set at token launch time to set initial value of token.

Members can redeem their NXM for ETH at a price 2.5% below the calculated buy price. Redemptions are contingent on MCR% > 100 and there being enough Ether in the capital pool. There is also a cap on the amount of NXM that can be redeemed per transaction.

Cover and Claims

The smart contract cover is a 3 page, high level document describing the smart contract cover. Claims are paid on a discretionary basis and the mutual members acting as claims assessors have the final say on whether a claim should be paid or not.

Member stake NXM when assessing a claim - if they agree with the consensus of other assessors they will receive a reward in NXM for assessing a claim. If they disagree their stake will be locked, if they are acting fruadulently there is the potential for their stake to be burned. As a discretionary mutual their is no legal obligation to play claims and the system relies on members acting honestly when assessing claims. While it would be in the short term interest for members to deny claims and preserve capital this would quickly lead to loss of future customers purchasing cover and the DAO relies on long term incentives of a healthy mutual and NXM token price keeping the behaviour of assessors honest.

Governance

The DAO uses GovBlocks to make decisions together

Resources

GriffGreen commented 4 years ago

Zeptimus will review

drllau commented 4 years ago

Legal review of the current Articles of Association under the laws of UK. The essence is membership contribution in return for discretionary cover aka self-insurance

  1. Mutual is association of admitted members

    • limited by guarantee so no shares (or concept of disinterested ownership)
    • quorum of 20% for formal meetings (general/special)
    • smart contract defined as "protocol .. to digitally facilitate, verify or enforce the negotiation or performance of a contract allowing ... credible transactions without 3rd party
    • rules govern member-member interactions
    • raise or borrow monies, or guarantee payment for contract
    • can appoint/delegate a community interest company to manage aspects of business
    • winding up excess contributions donated to charity and illiquid assets (tokens?) distributed according to formula
    • maximum liability is 1 pound (for purposes of winding up) up to 1 year after leaving
  2. Board of (executive) Directors (2-5)

    • separate? 5 advisory board differs from traditional firm supervisory role)
    • self elected with power to remove themselves
    • no alternate during meetings 2.1 Duties ... good faith towards success of mutual 2.2 Powers
    • power to approve membership (incl orgs)
    • power to define classes of members with different rights/obligations
    • determine meetings (agenda?)

2.3 Conflict of interest a lot of details ... most likely copied from other mutuals

  1. Membership (detailed elsewhere???) 3.1 Application 3.2 Removal

  2. Cover

    • payment of claims related to liabilities, losses or expenses
    • enter into (re)insurance for individual member, subset or mutual as whole
  3. Decision voting = 1+ (#tokens (special) || max(5%. tokens) (normal)) poll (mechanism as specified in general notice) proxy vote valid if 48hrs interval b4 meeting but can be overridden by appointor 6 month director honeymoon to unilaterally modify contracts for external compliance purposes

This type of arrangement (executive directors) falls into the self-appointed wise-(wo)men ... however may fall afoul of UK's shadow-director laws. However, given the low exit cost (liability of 1 pound) and residual claim (up to 5 years) there's incentive to keep membership up. But quorum of 20% suggests possible scaling livelock at future stage. Intriguing they have option to delegate to a CIC.

image This shows that efficiencies gained by replacing employees (for claims assessment) by mutual members and possibly outsourcing non-core activities with reduced agency costs. In theory, separation of concerns allow for faster transition to new web3 technologies rather than current optimised central IT processes. (xref Coase transaction cost)