Open michael-hawker opened 3 years ago
Hello michael-hawker, thank you for opening an issue with us!
I have automatically added a "needs triage" label to help get things started. Our team will analyze and investigate the issue, and escalate it to the relevant team if possible. Other community members may also look into the issue and provide feedback 🙌
Describe the problem this feature would solve
Allow for alternate SDK versions #52 (as well as V1 vs. V2 connections, or leaner HTTP only based implementations (refit?)) and alternate implementations to other ecosystems (though not a priority for us, would allow controls better re-use for others).
Describe the solution
Was thinking now that we've started isolating the authentication method in #76, that it may make sense to extend that to the Graph SDK itself. If we create a common interface for any calls we need to make, that can be in our base packages and referenced by our controls package, but then we could put the implementation that drives the controls in a separate packages. Then hook them up later.
This would provide a number of ways to implement the connection to the Graph which should let us:
Just like authentication, we don't have to make assumptions or dictations on what apps have to use to leverage the controls themselves to improve their apps.
FYI @shweaver-MSFT