On the apes, sex chromosome coverage is about 5% lower when aligning diploid (instead of haploid) versions of the same samples. Autosomes are about the same.
I'm trying to extract a small region that illustrates this from the real data. But in the meantime, here's a hack to reproduce the same effect using the test data, by adding a yeast chromosome as a dummy haplotype. The coverage drops >10% here, but it seems like an easier case -- because the other haplotypes are effectively unaligned, they shouldn't get int the way by fragmenting outgroups, breaking chains etc.
On the apes, sex chromosome coverage is about 5% lower when aligning diploid (instead of haploid) versions of the same samples. Autosomes are about the same.
I'm trying to extract a small region that illustrates this from the real data. But in the meantime, here's a hack to reproduce the same effect using the test data, by adding a yeast chromosome as a dummy haplotype. The coverage drops
>10%
here, but it seems like an easier case -- because the other haplotypes are effectively unaligned, they shouldn't get int the way by fragmenting outgroups, breaking chains etc.haploid
diploid