Open Moloq opened 6 years ago
You misunderstand their conclusion. They say that many researchers who use traditional regressions (usually based on Gaussian distribution as I know) think it is biased, but other researchers using Bayesian methods can control the effects from unobserved dependencies.
Not a deep question, but it wasn't very clear to me at all... In the conclusions, they mention that using dyadic events (which sounds to be the same as the orientation reading, or very similar) is not the right approach for multilateral events because of an assumption of independence that isn't valid. Could anyone expand on that? Why would this be the case? Does it affect the validity of other uses of dyadic events?