Closed birkantunc closed 8 months ago
This may have to do with the bug that you discovered. We'll need to look at this
When I fixed #13 the duality gap decreased significantly to ~200. But still too large. I'm re-training a basis (with the large sample) and will see if this issue persists.
Looks like convergence issues disappear when we re-train a new basis with a larger sample.
When estimating localized expressions coefficients (compute_local_exp_coefficients.py), we get many of the following warnings (even after installing the specific version of scikit-learn==1.1.3)
duality gap: 873.6964420412301
seems to be very large. Does this mean estimated values are not reliable?