Closed lbraglia closed 9 years ago
Nice idea but do you think this is really necessary? The increment-version-*
targets do this automatically. But maybe we should update the date in the release
target as well ... What do you think?
oops... didn't saw it was already implemented in increment-version-*
:) ...
Adding "...and update DESCRIPTION Date field"
to increment-version-*
documentation lines would be enough IMHO, eg. no need to change release
.
Another point could be whether to add or not Date:
in DESCRIPTION, if absent.
I see no cons of adding by default, but may be wrong/"paternalistic"... In the case, docs for increment-version-*
could be "...and set DESCRIPTION Date field"
Let me know, Luca
The Date
field is added if missing. I also updated the docs.
ok, thanks!
A proposed target (name can be changed) for those that always forget to update package release date (yours truly in first line)