Closed slizzered closed 9 years ago
Do you think it would be better to replace these line by using ...
?
Both variants are equivalent for gcc, don't know about MSVC. For now, I considered the typedef
for more "classic" and therefore more compatible. But you are right, the using
syntax is a lot nicer. I will try both when testing on Windows
I think if you rebase with current dev, we can merge this.
Now I call you the master of rebase !!! :imp:
typename
is not required here by gcc and MSVC even throws an error (see #85 )Probably should be tested before we merge (I might do the testing later on)
This fixes #85