Closed etiennecallies closed 3 years ago
When clicking on a &
connective in the conclusion of a &
rule with twice the same premise, a strange proof-copying is involved.
Try clicking on the lower &
connective in this proof.
When clicking on a
&
connective in the conclusion of a&
rule with twice the same premise, a strange proof-copying is involved. Try clicking on the lower&
connective in this proof.
Good catch 👍🏻
Double click reverses hereditarily the reversible sub-formulas? Dedicated button for full reversing of all concluding reversible formulas (including reversible sub-formulas)?
Trying to reverse a !
with not a ?
-context generates an error message Can not apply 'promotion' rule: the context must contain formulas starting by '?' only.
It is OK, but just to mention that an alternative would be not to activate reversibility of !
in such a situation. Not sure what is the best to do.
I opened #163 for the enhancements of this feature.
Specs:
Can not apply on preprod now, due to maintenance.