Open olaure01 opened 3 years ago
Is it an expected behavior? Should we ignore selection when there is already the formula without whynot? https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/7634514/116568410-bf584e00-a908-11eb-88ad-0efe2511ba6d.mp4
Not really expected... multiple actions on the auto-reverse button neither...
Indeed checking the immediate sub-formula is not already there is nice, but would not solve the case of ?(X|(Y&Z)),X,Y
for example.
Add the following auto-reverse rule:
?A
with context withZero
,Dual
andLitt
only maps toA, ?A
with same context (i.e. apply contraction and dereliction) if not of the shapeX, X^, ?A
.