Open weijia-cheng opened 1 year ago
<time>
, I like it at least on years because they're often pronounced differently than numbers, and I'm not sure a screen reader always pronounces them in the typical two-digit x2 method ("nineteen ten") - not that most do it right anyway, but maybe someday. I reverted it so that all that's left is Please let me know your thoughts on madroño and the remaining
I discovered when I corrected the epigraph in "Caracosa" I neglected to wrap it in <header>
elements. That's been pushed. I also added links to the SE collections of Poe and Maupassant in the quote in the long description.
I think you accidentally took out the <time>
for the year in "Present at a Hanging" (look for 1853).
Typography
typogrify
removes word joiners in your long description, which I think you should accept.the-isle-of-pines.xhtml
: You have an instance of<i>[sic]</i>
.Spelling
modernize-spelling
changessheweth
toshoweth
, which I think you should accept. I see that it’s in the context of a “quote” but they are both archaic sound-alikes and it doesn’t make sense to me that in our corpus we would changeshew
toshow
but notsheweth
toshoweth
.Semantics
chapter
s and notdivision
s.Commit History
Metadata
Comments
<time>
semantics, but it seems excessive and not really necessary. Generally, I wouldn’t put<time>
s in normal running text (though again, it isn’t wrong to do so).