Open mh-concordium opened 10 months ago
With the current implementation this is expected behavior since at the step 6, the credentials that were used are both different than the ones that were used at step 5. In a sense, it is the same as proof rejected at step 4 where you are basically trying to prove the same thing twice.
Bug Description This is a case where I have issued credentials twice, so I have 2 active credentials for Telegram (T1 and T2) and 2 active credentials for Discord (D1 and D2). It seems that there is inconsistent behavior in how it is possible to prove ownership over the accounts. Using credentials pairs to prove as described in the following steps below.
Steps to Reproduce
Expected Result It should be possible to verify ownership over the accounts in step 6. That would be consistent with verification in step 5.
Actual Result With the step 6, verification is not successful.
Versions