Rationale details for CIP-107 - Githubissues

Conflux-Chain / CIPs

Conflux Improvement Proposals (CIPs)

MIT License

24 stars 28 forks source link

Rationale details for CIP-107 #108

Closed darwintree closed 1 year ago

darwintree commented 1 year ago

It's a good idea to burn storage collateral when defunding to mitigate inflation of CFX tokens. However, rationale details are currently missed for CIP-107. For example,

The estimation of the transaction fee growth. This is important for developers and users.
The estimation of the inflation rate change. This can guide DAO to decided p.
Why the minimal p but not zero is choosen as 0.25, and won't this value greatly increase the transaction fee?

I hope these details could be added to the next version of CIP-107

ChenxingLi commented 1 year ago

The original design of CIP-107 has been replaced.