ConnectProject / mavoix-panel

0 stars 1 forks source link

"indisponible", "invisible", are properties of each image, not filtering criteria #65

Closed r03ert0 closed 3 years ago

r03ert0 commented 3 years ago

"indisponible", "invisible", are properties of each image, not filtering criteria

Screenshot 2021-04-24 at 11 51 08
narduin commented 3 years ago

I changed those criteria for "public" and "private" images. Is is possible to show only the user's images or only the community's images?

r03ert0 commented 3 years ago

it's not public and private: "invisible" is an image that doesn't show in mavoix-app (because you don't want the kid to see it) "indisponible" is an image that's marked with a big red dot, for example, because the kid is not allowed to have chocolate anymore, or it's not possible to go out at the moment, etc. Unline "invisible", the "indisponible" image does appear but it's not possible to use it.

r03ert0 commented 3 years ago

additionally, at the moment, all images imported through upload, or acquired through the webcam are private and unavailable to other users of the app.

narduin commented 3 years ago

"invisible" is an image that doesn't show in mavoix-app (because you don't want the kid to see it) "indisponible" is an image that's marked with a big red dot, for example, because the kid is not allowed to have chocolate anymore, or it's not possible to go out at the moment, etc. Unline "invisible", the "indisponible" image does appear but it's not possible to use it. additionally, at the moment, all images imported through upload, or acquired through the webcam are private and unavailable to other users of the app.

Yes I understand that. That's why I propose to offer the possibility to filter images based on who uploaded them (the user or the "community"). "Invisible“ and "indisponible" are still available when editing an image!

r03ert0 commented 3 years ago

oh! ok.

But filtering by "indisponible" or "invisible" doesn't make sense.

More meaningful filtering criteria would be private/public, drawing/photograph, with/without background, colour/black&white, action/object, etc. More generally, the mechanism that would be nice to have is one that would allow us to give "tags" to pictures, and then filter by tag. We could automatically tag private/public, drawing/b&w, etc., but it would be nice to have the possibility to add additional tags in the future (even, potentially, allow users to add their own tags).

narduin commented 3 years ago

But filtering by "indisponible" or "invisible" doesn't make sense. More meaningful filtering criteria would be private/public,

That's exactly what I did ^^

r03ert0 commented 3 years ago

sorry :p cool! could you paste an image? can we close this issue then?

narduin commented 3 years ago

Desktop-gallery--filter