Closed AndreasPvd closed 5 years ago
Rules affected are:
[BR-AE-10]-A VAT breakdown (BG-23) with VAT Category code (BT-118) "Reverse charge" shall have a VAT exemption reason code (BT-121), meaning "Reverse charge" or the VAT exemption reason text (BT-120) "Reverse charge" (or the equivalent standard text in another language).
[BR-G-10]-A VAT breakdown (BG-23) with the VAT Category code (BT-118) "Export outside the EU" shall have a VAT exemption reason code (BT-121), meaning "Export outside the EU" or the VAT exemption reason text (BT-120) "Export outside the EU" (or the equivalent standard text in another language).
[BR-IC-10]-A VAT breakdown (BG-23) with the VAT Category code (BT-118) "Intra-community supply" shall have a VAT exemption reason code (BT-121), meaning "Intra-community supply" or the VAT exemption reason text (BT-120) "Intra-community supply" (or the equivalent standard text in another language).
[BR-O-10]-A VAT breakdown (BG-23) with VAT Category code (BT-118) " Not subject to VAT" shall have a VAT exemption reason code (BT-121), meaning " Not subject to VAT" or a VAT exemption reason text (BT-120) " Not subject to VAT" (or the equivalent standard text in another language).
Therefore, we would check the following codes in CEF VATEX:
I have some questions to this resolution, in the VATEX code list there are several different codes available, are we certain no other codes can be used? Example: if VAT category = AE, only code "vatex-eu-ae" is allowed. In the VATEX codelist the following remark is found for this code "Only use with VAT category code AE".
So should be instead check that if TaxExemptionReasonCode = "vatex-eu-ae", then VAT category must be AE? (And similar for the other codes where this kind of remark is made?) And how do we handle this as this is a rule enforced by CEF and the VATEX codelist, and is not a EN16931 rule as such
We will revert this change and ask CEF for the correspondance between the codes and the VAT category codes
Now, that CEF VATEX is available and already partly implemented in these artefacts, shouldn't the corresponding business rules referencing the codelist be updated as well?
Example:
BR-AE-10 states
So in my opinion this and the other rules should be updated accordingly...
Br, Andreas