Closed SLennartsson closed 4 years ago
I'd prefer a slight variant of your second option:
[UBL-CR-666]-A UBL invoice with an AdditonalDocumentReference referring to an Invoice Object Identifier should not include an Attachment”
I think that they can include attachments, but not on the AdditionalDocumentReference that refers to an Invoice Object Identifier, so I would go for Soren's first option:
“[UBL-CR-666]-A UBL invoice should not include an AdditonalDocumentReference simultaneously referring an Invoice Object Identifier and an Attachment”
The current error signal “[UBL-CR-666]-A UBL invoice should not include the AdditonalDocumentReference referring to an Invoice Object Identifier should not include an Attachment” should be re-worded in order to increase clarity.
Suggested new wording: