The text for UBL-CR-666 reads "A UBL invoice should not include an AdditonalDocumentReference simultaneously referring an Invoice Object Identifier and an Attachment" but it is flagged as a FATAL error.
This comes from a change in v1.3.1. requested by Peppol here: #90
The problem is that the wording of the business rule was not correctly changed.
Will change should to shall in the assertion.
The text for UBL-CR-666 reads "A UBL invoice should not include an AdditonalDocumentReference simultaneously referring an Invoice Object Identifier and an Attachment" but it is flagged as a
FATAL
error.Should this not become a
WARNING
therefor?