search

ConnectingEurope / eInvoicing-EN16931

Validation artefacts for the European eInvoicing standard EN 16931
Other
140 stars 54 forks source link

Missing Codes in BR-CL-23 #247

Closed EskerEDIServices closed 3 years ago

EskerEDIServices commented 4 years ago

During the XRechnung tests we noticed an inconsistency in the EN16931 validation:

The rule states that UnitCodes must comply with UNECERec20 with extension by UNECERec21. If I now check the unit code "RO" in https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/billing/3.0/codelist/UNECERec21/, it is allowed. However, in the documentation of this rule (https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/billing/3.0/rules/ubl-tc434/BR-CL-23/), as well as in the validation stylesheet "EN16931-UBL-validation.xsl" the code is not included.

Is this inconsistency already known? Is there a reason why not all codes from UNECERec21 have been included in the rule?

SLennartsson commented 3 years ago

We (SFTI) have RO - roll - in our shortlist of UoM, implemented as XRO. It works - please note the implementation rule in section 10.11 of https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/billing/3.0/bis/

oriol commented 3 years ago

@midran can you look at this issue. The code RO is not in the current code list identified in #271

oriol commented 3 years ago

You need to use XRO.

The codes from Rec 21 shall be prefixed with an X and this code is on the list. This is in accordance with the rules defined by ISO when using Rec 20 and Rec 21 together.