Closed libertylocked closed 6 years ago
Merging #47 into master will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #47 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.52% 96.52%
=======================================
Files 4 4
Lines 115 115
Branches 25 25
=======================================
Hits 111 111
Misses 4 4
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
contracts/LinniaRecords.sol | 98.27% <ø> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dcf656a...9f9586f. Read the comment docs.
fixes #51 maybe
Do we get any new functionality here? Or do we fix any bug?
Better coverage
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 10:49 AM Max Blaushild notifications@github.com wrote:
Do we get any new functionality here? Or do we fix any bug?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ConsenSys/Linnia-Smart-Contracts/pull/47#issuecomment-397645808, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABXBggQ3xfEfu5tZhjCleJ1WCwcPU_NAks5t88lggaJpZM4Uo-0S .
consider leaving whenNotPaused where is already exists.
Adding whenNotPaused to the internal method is not a problem. But I do not like removing whenNotPaused from the external/public methods. I would rather have the whenNotPaused as part of the public/external function signature. This is a way of self-documenting the code.
Also do you know why test coverge has not increased?
Coverage 96.52% 96.52%
line coverage doesn't change branch coverage ↑
The branch coverage is unchanged at 25
Branches 25 25
Does our coverage tool not work?