Closed axic closed 8 years ago
@axic I guess this repo is not being actively maintained (which is the reason I created solparse). However, I'd be happy to merge if ConsenSys team is interested.
This project is being maintained so long as features are needed, and it's used actively in Truffle 2.0.
@axic Which project should this go into (or should merge with this)?
Ah, I didn't read the title. I'll check it out
@duaraghav8 I'd be happy to merge those changes. Somehow I missed your PR, which you submitted two weeks ago. I'll add the merge of your whole fork into my list of current tasks. I appreciate your help. Thanks @axic for bringing this to my attention. @duaraghav8, apologies for not seeing your initial PR.
@tcoulter That's great! The only changes made are in solidity.pegjs
and build/parser.js
.
I created my fork primarily so I could quickly push code and make releases, since 4 of my projects are now (heavily) dependant on solidity parser.
Please let me know if you require anything from my side.
Sorry for the lateness on this. Your fork has been merged into the master branch. I added some code to the parsing examples to cover the bugs that you fixed. I didn't keep the rename of solidity-parser.pegjs
, however (mostly a stylistic preference, though open to the rename if there's a better reason).
Just to better communicate the situation: I maintain Truffle, ethereumjs-testrpc, solidity-parser and EtherPudding (among other things) as a one-man team. Though it may take me a bit to get to PR's, I'm very happy to receive them and I very much love the participation. In the future, definitely submit more PRs for all your fixes (I know you tried with one, but it took me awhile to get to). I really appreciate it.
Thanks again!
@duaraghav8 FYI: solidity-parser 0.1.0 released. Also, I kept you in the list of authors in package.json. Thanks again.
Awesome! Nope, keeping the same name is fine.
Sure, I will be submitting issues & PRs soon, since a couple of people have raised solidity-parser related issues on my repos (my projects rely on this module).
Thanks! =)
👏
Would it be possible to have a single project for AST parsing?
cc @tcoulter @duaraghav8