AccountConcept

[webthethird]

I'm not sure it's true that subclasses of EthOn Account Concept relate exclusively to accounts.

One quick counterexample: AccountState is a subclass of both EthOn Account Concept and State, the latter of which is a subclass of EthOn State Concept.

Is this an incorrect or suboptimal categorization? In other words, is it desirable for EthOn Account Concept to group concepts/subclasses that are exclusive to accounts?

[chronaeon]

This is a good point. Maybe it would better to say that the EthOn Account Concept category deals exclusively with Account Concepts, but that seems overly redundant.

Either way the "exclusive" should probably go. I am trying to think of definitions more descriptive than "Groups all acct. concepts" etc. but I'm coming up short on exactly how to make that more descriptive in a way that's meaningful to a user.

[webthethird]

@chronaeon Perhaps something like this: "The group of EthOn concepts pertaining to Accounts existing within Ethereum"