ConsumerDataStandardsAustralia / infosec

Work space for the consumer data right information security profile development in Australia
MIT License
16 stars 5 forks source link

Consent should be explicit #22

Closed WestpacOpenBanking closed 5 years ago

WestpacOpenBanking commented 5 years ago

We agree with the comment made by da-banking on the draft standards. That is, in accordance with the legislation and ACCC draft rules framework consent should be express, informed and specific as to use. In particular, our expectation is that customers should be able to choose which accounts are in the scope of a consent.

lukepopp commented 5 years ago

Thanks @WestpacOpenBanking, I'll park this under new labels for consent and feedback.

rjshanahan commented 5 years ago

While Tic:Toc Home Loans agrees that consent should be explicit, there needs to be a mechanism by which the extent of the consent scope is indicated.

Consumers shouldn't be able to obfuscate their banking relationship by excluding some accounts from consent. For example, excluding a credit card when applying for a consumer credit product. This will result in organisations reverting to traditional, 'closed' mechanisms such as scraping and credit bureaus.

A boolean that indicates that accounts have been excluded from the consent would go some way to addressing this.

JamesMBligh commented 5 years ago

Under the CDR authority for sharing derives directly from the customer. Sharing under the regime is not expected to be an implied statement of a full financial profile and more than a manual statement provided voluntarily by a customer would be assumed to be true without attestation and verification.

In direct response to the issue raised by @WestpacOpenBanking, and in light of the recently published ACCC draft rules, the following is assumed by the standards:

Hope this helps clarify.

-JB-