Closed priyaH-OriginEnergy closed 2 years ago
Given this change request was raised late during the iteration, the DSB proposes it be carried over to the next maintenance iteration.
@priyaH-OriginEnergy, could you provide an example use case or scenario that can help understand the problem. It will help work through solution options.
To help facilitate discussion, the DSB would like to summarise our understanding of the problem:
If the above understanding is correct, the current structure should allow representation of point 1 within the EnergyPlanTariffPeriod schema using the ‘type’ attribute to specify the charge type (e.g. ENVIRONMENTAL) and specifying rateBlockUType as timeOfUseRates.
The second point can be addressed by including an optional ‘timeZone’ attribute within EnergyPlanTariffPeriod so charge specific time zones can be provided. If absent, contract level timezone would be assumed.
Hi DSB,
The above statement is correct for first point and agree with the solution proposed. With the second agree with the the proposed solution for time zone attribute.
Regards, Ram
This change was incorporated into release v1.17.0. Refer to https://github.com/ConsumerDataStandardsAustralia/standards/issues/237 for further details.
Description
Pricing Model & Time Zone should be represented at the charge level not at the plan level
Area Affected
Energy APIs - Account Detail API
Change Proposed
Pricing Model (such as TOU, Single Rate etc.) and Time Zone for C&I customers are specific to charge categories such as usage, environmental, metering etc. and can therefore vary. These attributes are currently defined at the plan level within the Account Detail API, these should instead be defined at a charge category level