Open scw opened 6 years ago
repo.anaconda.com is the only authoritative source of packages. The anaconda channel on anaconda.org is a mirror (and a bad one that shouldn't be used, by the way, because it loses the distinction between the newer "main" defaults channel and the older "free" defaults channel.
the_silver_searcher is the only one on:
@msarahan I just linked to the packages as they were listed on anaconda.org, I see both when searching the normal "defaults" channel:
the-silver-searcher 2.0.0 1 defaults
the_silver_searcher 2.1.0 h20f5147_0 defaults
2.2.0 0 defaults
Yes the defaults channel includes the old free channel but importantly at a lower priority.
Is this duplication causing you some problems?
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018, 10:35 PM Shaun Walbridge notifications@github.com wrote:
@msarahan https://github.com/msarahan I just linked to the packages as they were listed on anaconda.org, I see both when searching the normal "defaults" channel:
the-silver-searcher 2.0.0 1 defaults the_silver_searcher 2.1.0 h20f5147_0 defaults 2.2.0 0 defaults
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ContinuumIO/anaconda-issues/issues/10133#issuecomment-426071367, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA_pdOl0TYkw_etQep6Lh0PDCwB2dwy2ks5ugoqygaJpZM4XC4dU .
Yeah, fair enough. I'll reopen since defaults includes both.
Actual Behavior
Two separate entries for
ag
are listed:https://anaconda.org/anaconda/the_silver_searcher https://anaconda.org/anaconda/the-silver-searcher
Expected Behavior
A single listing for The Silver Searcher, the duplication makes it confusing to know which one to install (the underscore version looks to be correct -- it has newer packages and is the same name used by other instances of the package (such as conda-forge). I don't know if there's a way to fold these packages into a single one (redirects?), but if possible it'd be nice to only have one entry for these two packages.