Closed cockroach888 closed 3 years ago
@CoreyKaylor I think they are asking about a strong named assembly? Is that something you think is a good idea?
I would recommend using something like https://www.nuget.org/packages/StrongNamer/ if you have those kind of requirements. I don't really have an interest right now in signing the assembly.
thinks.
你好,很感谢提供了这么好用的类库,在使用过程中,我一般会下载源代码加已分析,然后直接从 NuGet 中获取到版本,并添加到项目引用当中,但由于我的项目都是使用了强签名的,而在 NuGet 中获取到的并没有签名,虽然我可以手动加上一个签名,但这样会造成二次操作,容易在更新时忘记,所以,还是希望从 NuGet 中获致到的版本本身就是带签名的,谢谢。
Hello, thank you for providing such a useful library, in the process of using it, I usually download the source code plus analysis, and then get the version directly from NuGet and add it to the project reference, but because my projects are using a strong signature, and the one obtained in NuGet does not have a signature, although I can add a signature manually, but this will cause a second operation, easy to forget when updating, so, I still hope that the version obtained from NuGet itself is signed, thank you.
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)