Closed uint closed 1 month ago
This doesn't break the API in a very serious way.
I think if we want to do the same for 256-bit and 512-bit values, we'll need to break API by adding larger variants to this enum. I guess we might as well (in another PR) since we're likely to release cw-storage-plus 3.0.0.
This doesn't break the API in a very serious way.
I think if we want to do the same for 256-bit and 512-bit values, we'll need to break API by adding larger variants to this enum. I guess we might as well (in another PR) since we're likely to release cw-storage-plus 3.0.0.