Open webmaster128 opened 1 year ago
Locally I'm testing the two optimization modes with wasm-opt version 110:
$ wasm-opt --help … -Os execute default optimization passes, focusing on code size -Oz execute default optimization passes, super-focusing on code size …
For my tests, there is a difference in the order of magnitute of 1-2%:
# -Os -rwxr-xr-x 1 me staff 192130 16 Okt 17:27 nois_demo.wasm -rwxr-xr-x 1 me staff 480903 16 Okt 17:27 nois_oracle.wasm -rwxr-xr-x 1 me staff 225705 16 Okt 17:27 nois_proxy.wasm # -Oz -rwxr-xr-x 1 me staff 189263 16 Okt 17:29 nois_demo.wasm -rwxr-xr-x 1 me staff 472586 16 Okt 17:29 nois_oracle.wasm -rwxr-xr-x 1 me staff 223632 16 Okt 17:29 nois_proxy.wasm
So for now I don't see a strong need to move away from the well established -Os.
-Os
Some more example numbers from https://twitter.com/const_amit/status/1752210883156062660:
Locally I'm testing the two optimization modes with wasm-opt version 110:
For my tests, there is a difference in the order of magnitute of 1-2%:
So for now I don't see a strong need to move away from the well established
-Os
.