Closed lkilcommons closed 5 years ago
Thanks for the report Liam.
I’ll take a look. Just a heads up that develop is the most current and has a number of changes compared to master. I’m planning on pulling into master very soon, once I get back to Dallas and have some time to catch up.
Cheers, Russell
On Nov 16, 2018, at 11:08 AM, Liam Kilcommons notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:
After a successful installation python setup.py install, nosetest -vs pysatMagVect fails with No module pysat. Minor problem, but might be good if pysat were added to optional dependancies in setup.py. e.g.
'tests_require=[pysat]'
or
extras_require={'testing':[nose,pysat]}
Not clear which is best practice, I've seen both. I think tests_require is specifically if you want python setup.py test to run your tests. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26064738/should-pytest-et-al-go-in-tests-require-or-extras-requiretesting
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/rstoneback/pysatMagVect/issues/13, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADbdeYNLx8VqFRl6Nje6Dl9Gya5LKwb7ks5uvv8jgaJpZM4YmuYe.
Fix in pull #14 . I added pysat to the general requirements and nose via the extras_require. Thanks for posting for the issue.
After a successful installation
python setup.py install
,nosetest -vs pysatMagVect
fails withNo module pysat
. Minor problem, but might be good if pysat were added to optional dependancies in setup.py. e.g.or
Not clear which is best practice, I've seen both. I think tests_require is specifically if you want
python setup.py test
to run your tests. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26064738/should-pytest-et-al-go-in-tests-require-or-extras-requiretesting(Python 2.7 in virtual environment on Glade supercomputer)