According to blockscan the address 1CXj1bLMekh5XQJt9pygt6xkXVGWtKW3QW has 7784 assets registered to it and a balance of 0.0120993 BTC (+1.2207 BTC in multisig)... Yet when trying to sweep the user gets told they need another 3.97 BTC to do the sweep.?!?
Just some quick math shows the fee calculations are off by a considerable amount.
Side-note: Counterwallet seems to work ok with wallets with thousands of assets in them. It took a few minutes for counterwallet to load an address with 7000+ assets in it, but after a few minutes all loaded and worked fine.
---
Want to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/29071955-fee-calculation-issue-with-sweeping-funds?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F542579&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F542579&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).
Sweeping an address with large amounts of assets in it seems to go awry on fee calculations.
For instance, when trying to sweep address 1CXj1bLMekh5XQJt9pygt6xkXVGWtKW3QW the user gets a prompt that 3.97 BTC is needed to sweep this address.
https://gyazo.com/64f15ec114dbfde41314f13f182afb2b
According to blockscan the address 1CXj1bLMekh5XQJt9pygt6xkXVGWtKW3QW has 7784 assets registered to it and a balance of 0.0120993 BTC (+1.2207 BTC in multisig)... Yet when trying to sweep the user gets told they need another 3.97 BTC to do the sweep.?!?
Just some quick math shows the fee calculations are off by a considerable amount.
Side-note: Counterwallet seems to work ok with wallets with thousands of assets in them. It took a few minutes for counterwallet to load an address with 7000+ assets in it, but after a few minutes all loaded and worked fine.