Open tatyanade opened 4 years ago
Yes this is the expected behavior. these two functions use extremely super-sampled calculations, before downsampling them in the resample step. The "desirable" length should be viewed as the maximum stitch length in the resample step. I only called it "desirable" instead of maximum because the randomization might alter it a little bit, but otherwise it is the maximum.
So I think the correct solution is for the user to increase the minimum stitch length. If you think there's a better default value for minimum stitch length, please let me know the value thanks.
Makes sense, Ill specify this in the examples so users know why it behaves differently , & will do some different tests on things to see what values are best
these two fill functions ignore the desirable length from setStitch and instead use something a lot closer to minimum stitch length
spiral setStitch(2,10,0) , (2,50,0), and (50,50,0);
satin setStitch(100,100,0), (10,100,0), (10,10,0);
I dont think this makes to much sense logically in terms of it not acting as the desired length, and also the default min stitch is a bit to small for these two functions (will post pics of satin stitch soon)