Closed JakubVanek closed 3 years ago
This also breaks https://github.com/CreativeInquiry/PEmbroider#motivation, as this library is not OSS either.
@golanlevin
How about GPL or LGPL? I think the requirement that derivative work must also be open source is inherently anti-capitalist. Processing is GPL.
🤷♂️
How about GPL or LGPL? I think the requirement that derivative work must also be open source is inherently anti-capitalist. Processing is GPL.
IANAL, but I think that the derived work condition applies only to the program itself and not to the works generated by the program's operation (https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/a/311087 seems to agree).
OK. I have changed the license to a Frankenstein that combines GPLv3 with Anti-Capitalist Software License v.1.4; this has been updated here and here. I do not believe they are in conflict, since the ACSL is concerned with different things than the GPL.
@JakubVanek, I appreciate you flagging this issue. It is important to understand the reason we made PEmbroidery, which is that commercial embroidery software costs THOUSANDS of dollars, and has profiteering schemes like, it's an extra $100 to be able to add lettering, an extra $350 to edit shapes, and an extra $950 to add outlines. We believe that creating your own designs for your embroidery machine shouldn't require monthly financing. Thus, a quick summary of the kind of uses we are trying to encourage, prevent, and enforce would be as follows:
Hi all,
the README reads that
However, the ACSL website claims otherwise:
This was discovered in the discussion under https://www.abclinuxu.cz/zpravicky/pembroider-nova-knihovna-pro-processing-urcena-pro-navrh-vysivek-pro-vysivaci-stroje.
Best regards,
Jakub