Closed jeannekitchens closed 7 years ago
Why not use the ctdl:identiferValue?
@stuartasutton will edit additional information
Refer to the CTDL Guide "Identifiers" section http://credreg.net/ctdl/handbook#identifier
Deprecate: ceterms:partOfIdentifierValueSet Deprecate: ceterms:IdentifierVaueSet
Add: IdentifierType Definition: Formal name of the identifier type. Comments: Such as ISBN or SSN.
Actions to be taken:
(1) Deprecate property: ceterms:partOfIdentifierValueSet (2) Deprecate class: ceterms:IdentifierVaueSet Neither have "superseded by" terms
(3) Add property: identifierType
Label: identifierType Definition: "Formal name or acronym of the identifier type such as ISBN and SSN." Comment: None Type: Property Domain: Credential, Agent, LearningOpportunityProfile, AssessmentProfile Range: IdentifierValue Status: Stable
@stuartasutton to be consistent with our other definitions, should the above instead be: Definition: Formal name or acronym of the identifier type. Comment: Examples include ISBN and SSN.
I have made the changes listed above (and will close this issue pending Stuart's response to the question in my previous post) and noted them in the history tracking.
If it makes it more consistent, sure.
Thanks..
Nate, I messed this up.
Nate, I messed up his definition of identifierType
.
Corrected:
Label: identifierType Definition: Formal name or acronym of the identifier type. Comment: Examples include ISBN and SSN. Type: Property Domain: IdentifierValue Range: rdfs:Literal Status: Stable
I have made the updates: http://credreg.net/ctdl/pending#identifierType
@science had emailed this issue.
Determine if IdentifierValue entity is sufficient for the use case below
http://credreg.net/page/domainsviewer?showEditorMapping=true#IdentifierValue
It would be really useful if organization schema could have a data structure something like
This way, when organizations sign documents with a public key, we could have in our same database a statement that shows who is responsible for the key. The keys themselves are absent an identity - they're just strings. Being able to affiliate organizations with public keys would be a handy tool for figuring out who is who.
@mparsons1953 @stuartasutton @science is this an issue relevant to the Nov 17th release? What is the next step for discussion/resolving? I know @stuartasutton had replied to the email but I cannot find it so anyone who has more information, please post it here.