Closed stuartasutton closed 5 years ago
@stuartasutton
Both https://schema.org/Person and https://schema.org/Organization already has the naics and isicV4 properties. The naics types are Organization and Person, while the isicV4 types are Organization, Person and Place.
While Industry Classifications are relevant to Persons, Occupational Classifications are more important imho. This because occupations generally cross industry classifications on a one to many relationship.
My comment that you linked above was in response to a comment where the https://pending.schema.org/Occupation only includes the occupational categories for the North American SOC and the person would prefer the ISCO international classification system. Basically, I suggested we provide two properties, specific to each occupational classification system, instead of just the one property -- https://pending.schema.org/occupationalCategory with the SOC preference written into the description. (In this manner, we can allow the person providing the schema and the person querying the schema one of, or both of, the properties.)
For Occupational Classifications: The ISOC can be found here (08 is current). https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/@publ/documents/publication/wcms_172572.pdf
The NAICS / SOC can be found here (2010 is current) https://www.bls.gov/soc/
Also, for Persons, or Occupations we might want to consider including a property for the CIP (Classification of Instructional Programs). For instance, the Computer Science discipline now has 38 CIP codes (according to BLS/OES crosswalks), i.e. specialty degree programs / relevant fields of study. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cipcode/Default.aspx?y=55
@stuartasutton to verify:
URI: ceterms:isicV4 Label: ISIC Revision 4 Code Definition: The International Standard of Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC), Revision 4 code for a particular organization, business person, or place. Domain: ceterms:Credential (and subclasses), ceterms:CredentialOrganization, ceterms:QACredentialOrganization Range: xsd:string
Correct?
Correct!
I'll also include that it's an equivalent property to schema:isicV4.
Yes!
These changes have been made in pending CTDL and noted in the history tracking.
We currently have an
naics
property for industry code covering North America. We should also add anisicV4
code [1]-[2] (following schema.org that has both [3]) for international numbers. It should have the same domains as ournaics
.See: https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1698#issuecomment-477881620
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Industrial_Classification [2] https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesm/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf [3] https://schema.org/isicV4