Closed jasonbosch closed 2 years ago
Yes, that's the next major change planned. Hopefully this summer
That sounds great! I will definitely need to try it out then. It will also save me needing to specify package versions in my methods section (which few authors seem to do).
Is there an update regarding groundhog package's capability to incorporate R packages from BioConductor? I did not find any mention of it in latest version of groundhog package, and I am not sure if I have missed something
On a side note, groundhog is a very useful package, especially with the demise of checkpoint and MRAN
i was planning to do that this april/may, but with MRAN disappearing it lost priority. Next time i return to working on groundhog i plan on doing it, perhaps around October of this year, but no promises. If someone wants to collaborate and chip in with coding that would be welcomed too
It would be amazing to have groundhog for Bioconductor. There are just so many advantages over renv.
This looks like an interesting (and important) package but, currently, it will only go part-way to solving reproducible code in biological scripts. Many R scripts by biologists will use packages from Bioconductor (https://bioconductor.org/). I'm not sure whether the authors include biologists or not but I saw no mention of Bioconductor in either the Data Colada posts or the Groundhog website. Are there plans to include support for Bioconductor packages in the future?