I don’t see any experimental results? you should have the analysis to be as detailed as in ziang’s paper
you need to have the bayesian formulation in the paper; please don’t say that the formulation is similar to kay [36] (it is at a very high level, in that both use Bayesian analysis); not including the model doesn’t allow for experimental reproducibility (the very raison d’etre for Bayesian!). This will take up space in the main paper, so I suggest that you put the math in the appendix. Again, use Ziang’s paper as a guide on how to introduce all of this, including the annotations in the equations. CSCW reviewers want this level of explanation (simple and detailed).
@tiffanylwt can you verify if there's anything you want to add?