Closed lfdebrux closed 5 years ago
so I thought that it would be easier to manage if we had separate files for each test
That's understandable. I can see how this might be a step towards autogenerating the tests from upstream examples.
Will :thinking: about possible downsides though. It does mean that the test body for 90% of the tests is the same two lines, which is a little weird.
Will 🤔 about possible downsides though. It does mean that the test body for 90% of the tests is the same two lines, which is a little weird.
I did look at autogenerating the test body based on the files and pytest hooks, the user experience when tests fail is a little suboptimal though.
This is an experiment into reducing the fiddliness and repetition in writing tests for govuk-frontend-jinja.
It might be a failed experiment.
The basic premise is that for each test we should be comparing the output of a template file with the output of Nunjucks from that same template file, so I thought that it would be easier to manage if we had separate files for each test; it does mean a lot of files though...
What are people's thoughts?
The major advantage of this it that enables this PR https://github.com/alphagov/govuk-frontend-jinja/pull/28