search

Crylia / crylia-theme

A theme for AwesomeWM
516 stars 26 forks source link

[ENHANCEMENT] Autoinstall scripts for Arch and Pop_OS! #27

Closed JulianGR closed 2 years ago

JulianGR commented 2 years ago

As requested, here are the autoinstall scripts. I have thoroughly tested the Pop_OS! script but not the arch one because I don't pilot as much. I guess it works (I've just added the commads from all the steps of the installation).

Cheers =)

Crylia commented 2 years ago

I'll setup two VM's to test those scripts, if someone using arch wants to test it please do so I don't have to setup arch again :sob: . Once I tested it I'll merge it or notify you if something is wrong.

Crylia commented 2 years ago

You need to add "libxcb-xfixes0-dev" to the installation since won't compile awesomewm otherwise.

Crylia commented 2 years ago

"libev-dev" "libxcb-damage0-dev" "libxcb-sync-dev" "libxcb-composite0-dev" "libxcb-present-dev" "uthash-dev" "libconfig-dev" "libgl-dev" Those are all missing to compile rofi.

Crylia commented 2 years ago

The MesloLGS fonts aren't installed correctly and it would be nice if alacritty was installed too so you got a terminal to start. Currently the fonts downloaded with wget land in $HOME but should be in $HOME/.fonts

Crylia commented 2 years ago

Some more dependencies are missing for rofi I think: "libxcb-emwh-dev"

you also need to use ninja -C build before doing ninja -C build install Otherwise you will get an error

JulianGR commented 2 years ago

Okay you can check it now, I've made all the changes you've said =)

Crylia commented 2 years ago

I misstyped the package libxcb-emwh-dev but it should be libxcb-ewmh-dev.

It also seems that rofi needs more dependencies

I also had a weird problem where ninja and meson were installed, but I had to reinstall them for rofi to work? Maybe install it in its own line idk. Also rofi doesn't need sudo as I thought earlier, so Its just

I hope I got it right now.

Crylia commented 2 years ago

Alright this seems to work flawless now at least for the pop_os script. (tested in a fresh install of 22.04) Sadly I cannot really test the Archlinux script for now so I will simply assume that Its fine from taking a closer look to it.

Thanks very much for your contribution :)

JulianGR commented 2 years ago

Thank you for accepting my pull request =)