Closed dzlockhead closed 1 month ago
You need to rebase your branch to remove the merge conflicts and so we can actually see what the changes are
Okay, NOW it should be good unless I missed something else. @Greelan
I find this confusing tbh. Why is SITReleaseVersion needed?
It's used to choose the release tag on github. You told me that it won't work using just a file name and variable, which is the issue I had in testing. It worked for 1.6.4 but when I tried 1.6.5 without the UpdateSourceVersion, it still tried to look at release 1.6.5 for the file, so I use that to pick the release tag.
On Mon, May 20, 2024, 6:15 PM Greelan @.***> wrote:
I find this confusing tbh. Why is SITReleaseVersion needed?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/CubeCoders/AMPTemplates/pull/795#issuecomment-2121306604, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BE3Z6XNHOZNEPY6MKBIS4CTZDJYX5AVCNFSM6AAAAABIAMOKT6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMRRGMYDMNRQGQ . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
If you are specifying the full file name - as you are - then just use FetchURL. My comment was related to using GithubRelease where there was not a standard name format between releases. Its unnecessary to adopt an approach that requires the user to set two variables
Makes sense! Modifications made and should be good now. @Greelan
Just be aware that this will break existing instances until the user toggles the setting. The alternative is to keep the existing enum values but have separate update stages for each (based on conditions). This just might become a bit unsustainable as new versions are added in the future.
Just be aware that this will break existing instances until the user toggles the setting. The alternative is to keep the existing enum values but have separate update stages for each (based on conditions). This just might become a bit unsustainable as new versions are added in the future.
Do you think there'd be a better alternative?
I suggest taking the hit now so that it is sorted for the future
Or get the SIT devs to name their files more helpfully xD
We can only hope. Let's go for it and take the hit now haha.
You've got the SPT AKI Version setting in there twice
I am not sure how that occurred... It's been removed.
I am not sure how that occurred... It's been removed.
You haven't committed the change.
Added 1.6.5 SIT and 1.8.3 SPT. Removed incompatible SPT versions. Added SIT Release version and made it as easy as possible to understand.