Closed Chris00 closed 9 years ago
The content module addition to RSS2 allows to write:
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" ... > ... <content:encoded><![CDATA[ ... ]]></content:encoded>
Should we support this addition? It seems to be used by wordpress, hence by potentially a large number of feeds. Here is an example in the OCaml community.
Here are additional examples. I think we should add a content field of type string option.
content
string option
The content module addition to RSS2 allows to write:
Should we support this addition? It seems to be used by wordpress, hence by potentially a large number of feeds. Here is an example in the OCaml community.