search

CvGC / dict

9 stars 1 forks source link

xruti #12

Open solpahi opened 7 years ago

solpahi commented 7 years ago

Truncated to three places.

Definition now reads: x1 returns to being/doing x2 (ka) from being/doing x3 (ka).

The original notes no longer fit, so we need to completely rewrite them. Should include a couple important derivations like zvaxru.

uakci commented 7 years ago

✔

Ntsekees commented 7 years ago

.i'e Mentioning {xrugau} would also be good.

solpahi commented 7 years ago

Agreed about {xrugau}. And {xrukla}.

Also, I'd like to get rid of the slashes...

Since "doing" is a type of "being" (at least in the Lojban sense), the definition could probably just read:

x1 returns to being x2 (ka) from x3 (ka).

Although... is the x3 necessary?

x1 returns to being or doing x2 (ka).

And the notes need to say that {xruti} is neither agentive nor requires a volitional entity.

uakci commented 7 years ago

The 'returning-from' place is just as important as the 'going-from' of klama, so I wouldn't remove it.

On Aug 16, 2016 3:15 PM, "solpahi" notifications@github.com wrote:

Agreed about {xrugau}. And {xrukla}.

Also, I'd like to get rid of the slashes...

Since "doing" is a type of "being" (at least in the Lojban sense), the definition could probably just read:

x1 returns to being x2 (ka) from x3 (ka).

Although... is the x3 necessary?

x1 returns to being or doing x2 (ka).

And the notes need to say that {xruti} is neither agentive nor requires a volitional entity.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/CvGC/dict/issues/12#issuecomment-240097205, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGo4dEm9LkVYwURFDHh_pE7-pO5OV1LLks5qgbeMgaJpZM4JhFg3 .

eaburns commented 6 years ago

+1