x1 is an excess of / too much of x2 by standard x3.
Proposed new definition (such as by gleki on JVS), which people seem to already be using:
x1 is too x2 (ka) for x3 (nu) to happen.
Actually, la gleki’s definition has “ni” on the x2 place, but that doesn’t make sense to me: you definitely want to pass in the quality that the x2 satisfies too hard, such as “lo ka glare”. (Compare “lo ni glare”, which is already a number that can itself equal “du'e”.)
Old definition:
Proposed new definition (such as by gleki on JVS), which people seem to already be using:
Actually, la gleki’s definition has “ni” on the x2 place, but that doesn’t make sense to me: you definitely want to pass in the quality that the x2 satisfies too hard, such as “lo ka glare”. (Compare “lo ni glare”, which is already a number that can itself equal “du'e”.)