search

CyberCircuits / optiboot

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/optiboot
0 stars 0 forks source link

GitHub migration #91

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Bill,

Have you considered migrating optiboot to GitHub?  It's so much more of a 
fertile ground for collaboration.  It could benefit optiboot greatly on the 
long run.

I'd gladly help you with the migration if needed.

Best,
Laci

Original issue reported on code.google.com by l...@monda.hu on 30 Sep 2013 at 7:46

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Why?  I haven't seen a big comparison, and they seem very interchangeable to me.
Based on the Arduino github repository, I think I like the issue tracker here a 
bit better...

Original comment by wes...@gmail.com on 30 Oct 2013 at 1:51

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
In short, mainly because of pull requests.  I was thinking about submitting a 
patch for ATMega48 support but compared to pull requests creating a patch 
manually is so much of a hassle that I have little desire doing so.

Original comment by l...@monda.hu on 30 Oct 2013 at 9:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
You're assuming that trunk owners ever actually service pull requests.  It 
doesn't seem all that common on the github repositories I've seen.  Perhaps 
because

Original comment by wes...@gmail.com on 1 Nov 2013 at 11:58

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
It seems to me that you haven't finished your last "Perhaps because ..." 
sentence.  I'd be interested about your reasoning.

Please consider https://github.com/mondalaci/supervisord-php-client which is a 
project of mine.  I started it about a year ago and 6 contributors have 
submitted patches in the meantime.  This project may not be the norm but I'm 
confident that this level of collaboration wouldn't have happened anywhere else.

Original comment by l...@monda.hu on 2 Nov 2013 at 10:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I would also vouch for git and github.com as platform, because at least from my 
experience people are far more accustomed to it than to this platform. In 
general github.com offers far more and better development tools (bug tracker, 
stats, etc.) and is actively developed, whereas Google Code seems to be "dead" 
to me.

Original comment by johnpatc...@googlemail.com on 14 Aug 2014 at 6:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Done.   Now at https://github.com/Optiboot/optiboot

In general, I prefer to receive patches rather than pull/merge requests, so 
that I can make style corrections and minor changes, as "needed."

I think I like the Google Code issue handler a lot better than GitHub's.  Am I 
missing something?

Original comment by wes...@gmail.com on 21 Mar 2015 at 8:57