Closed PetarKirov closed 8 years ago
What I currently find missing is a test action, which would, for example, run the all the tests for DMD and then report only the ones that fail.
Agreed, would be nice to have.
Also, AFAIU, currently Digger may overwrite my changes with the files from the current commit, because it tries to ensure a clean build environment, which would be bad for my use case.
Agreed, Digger could save the state of the files upon finishing a build, and warn if they had been modified before overwriting them.
What I currently find missing is a test action, which would, for example, run the all the tests for DMD and then report only the ones that fail.
https://github.com/CyberShadow/Digger/commit/8223097ad9f6da9119c992ea3b1fddc9400183b9
Also, AFAIU, currently Digger may overwrite my changes with the files from the current commit, because it tries to ensure a clean build environment, which would be bad for my use case.
https://github.com/CyberShadow/ae/commit/a57972cb66b1bbfbfa7e1483de0e5e2d38d66569
I would like use Digger for dmd/druntime/phobos hacking. What I currently find missing is a
test
action, which would, for example, run the all the tests for DMD and then report only the ones that fail. If possible without rebuilding DMD, if there are no source or makefile changes (this is a low priority request, as I can imagine that this can be hard to implement).Also, AFAIU, currently Digger may overwrite my changes with the files from the current commit, because it tries to ensure a clean build environment, which would be bad for my use case.
Some examples:
Exposing this functionality through the web interface would be nice, but it's even lower priority on my list than test-only builds.