add incremental builds

[snosov1]

To perform an incremental build, provide a --incremental flag to the build command.

Needs https://github.com/CyberShadow/ae/pull/10

[CyberShadow]

I think it should be a separate command, because we effectively ignore the parameter to "build" now. Any reason for making it a switch?

[snosov1]

No particular reason. Just wanted to reuse the code.

Obviously, the duplication can be alleviated by introducing some function.

[snosov1]

No particular reason. Just wanted to reuse the code.

Obviously, the duplication can be alleviated by introducing some function.

Best regards, Sergei Nosov

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Vladimir Panteleev <notifications@github.com

wrote:

I think it should be a separate command, because we effectively ignore the parameter to "build" now. Any reason for making it a switch?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/CyberShadow/Digger/pull/9#issuecomment-65240888.

[CyberShadow]

No need for that, just add a switch case like what's done with "build-all". I think "rebuild" would be better, shorter to type too.

[snosov1]

Ok, I did this, but github is acting weird for me today. Most of the time I can't even ping it.

I will update the PR next time I have a chance.

Best regards, Sergei Nosov

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Vladimir Panteleev <notifications@github.com

wrote:

No need for that, just add a switch case like what's done with "build-all". I think "rebuild" would be better, shorter to type too.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/CyberShadow/Digger/pull/9#issuecomment-65242057.

[CyberShadow]

That's OK, I'll fix it up myself then. Thanks.

[CyberShadow]

b32b4814e3715c7777f52b52706471757b41a5ca

And documented in d3fdd54018896d186007f66ab6536fa782502868

[snosov1]

:+1: