[Defect]: Multiple licenses not supported

[galmo-noma]

Hello,

I am getting a warning since the schema does not correctly differentiate between the two options under licenseChoice. When filling more than one licenses (see example below), I am getting the warning that a maximum amount of 1 element is permitted in the schema, since it wrongly identifies my licenses as an SPDX expression and not license lists

For example, under components:

"licenses": [
                {
                    "license": {
                        "id": "CC-BY-SA-3.0",
                        "name": "Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0",
                        "url": "https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-SA-3.0.html"
                    }
                },
                {
                    "license": {
                        "id": "GFDL-1.3",
                        "name": "GNU Free Documentation License family",
                        "url": "https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0"
                    }
                }
            ],

Additional context

definition:

{
    "licenseChoice": {
        "title": "License Choice",
        "description": "EITHER (list of SPDX licenses and/or named licenses) OR (tuple of one SPDX License Expression)",
        "type": "array",
        "oneOf": [
            {
                "title": "Multiple licenses",
                "description": "A list of SPDX licenses and/or named licenses.",
                "type": "array",
                "items": {
                    "type": "object",
                    "title": "License",
                    "required": [
                        "license"
                    ],
                    "additionalProperties": false,
                    "properties": {
                        "license": {
                            "$ref": "#/definitions/license"
                        }
                    }
                }
            },
            {
                "title": "SPDX License Expression",
                "description": "A tuple of exactly one SPDX License Expression.",
                "type": "array",
                "additionalItems": false,
                "minItems": 1,
                "maxItems": 1,
                "items": [
                    {
                        "type": "object",
                        "additionalProperties": false,
                        "required": [
                            "expression"
                        ],
                        "properties": {
                            "expression": {
                                "type": "string",
                                "title": "SPDX License Expression",
                                "description": "A valid SPDX license expression.\nRefer to https://spdx.org/specifications for syntax requirements",
                                "examples": [
                                    "Apache-2.0 AND (MIT OR GPL-2.0-only)",
                                    "GPL-3.0-only WITH Classpath-exception-2.0"
                                ]
                            },
                            "acknowledgement": {
                                "$ref": "#/definitions/licenseAcknowledgementEnumeration"
                            },
                            "bom-ref": {
                                "$ref": "#/definitions/refType",
                                "title": "BOM Reference",
                                "description": "An optional identifier which can be used to reference the license elsewhere in the BOM. Every bom-ref must be unique within the BOM.\nValue SHOULD not start with the BOM-Link intro 'urn:cdx:' to avoid conflicts with BOM-Links."
                            }
                        }
                    }
                ]
            }
        ]
    },
}

Add any other context about the problem here.

[jkowalleck]

Thank you for the report, @galmo-noma . Could you help us understand the background of the issue?

I am getting a warning [...] [...] since it wrongly identifies my licenses as an SPDX expression [...]

What is giving you this warning? Could you share how the tool(?) is called exactly, which parameters/switches/arguments were used, and so on?