Closed madpah closed 4 days ago
DNS names has a clear well documented format with TLD at the end. As this is a name intended for resolution in the DNS, and not as an DNS-independent identifier, I do not think doing the reverse would be helpful. It's not an IETF supported standard.
And as a non-Java developer I did not think there was an alternative, so all examples are in FQDN form ;-)
You are right that it's not documented, it was assumed by me. We obviously need to clarify.
To be clear - I have no strong preference either way. Unless we receive any strong opinions, I'd suggest we go with domain-name
in FQDN form - so cyclonedx.org
and NOT org.cyclonedx
.
I think we're in agreement on using it the FQDN way as it is intended to be resolved using DNS. Let's close this.
See https://cyclonedx.slack.com/archives/C04LR6R9T8E/p1730984569287219
This is to track to resolution and decision whether
domain-name
portion of TEI is reverse of forwards format.Example "forwards":
cyclonedx.org
Example "reverse":
org.cyclonedx
There are advantages of both, but it is currently not documented which is intended in the TEI.
FYI @stevespringett @oej